I Covered LIGO Before It Was Cool

Back in 2005 when I was an undergraduate in Physics at LSU, I tried to cover LIGO for the weekly campus newspaper I freelanced for, Tiger Weekly. You may have heard of LIGO in recent days with the discovery of gravity waves. Well, I knew what they were trying to do over a decade ago and how cool and monumental a thing it would be. I just had trouble convincing others of this fact.

The problem was things were tumultuous at the paper with a new editor and an attempt to adjust the content to appeal to a broader readership. And the way things worked was a writer would propose a story idea, the editor(s) would give it the green light or not, and then the writer would go to work on the story for the next issue. Well, this process did not guarantee the story would ever be published and the writer paid.

I was considered the news guy at the time and was often tasked with some of the more difficult subjects and stories we covered, especially the technical ones. This was not necessarily a good role to have to play at a paper more focused on drug use, student’s sex lives, sports, selling beer and bar ads, and covering whatever the controversial flavor of the month was, but I played it. I enjoyed it, usually. I actually learned about LIGO while covering some other stories coming out of LSU’s Center for Computation for Computation and Technology (CCT), like the hiring of a former NASA JPL computer scientist, Dr. Thomas Sterling, that went by the nickname “tron.” It was cool stuff.

Well, LIGO fascinated me when I learned about it for a few reasons. First, I love reading stuff about black holes and gravity and I got to speak with people using supercomputers to model the collision of spiraling neutron stars. Nerd heaven.

Second, LIGO is based in Livingston, Louisiana, which is about an hour from LSU’s campus, and it seemed shocking that such research was being done in the state. It was like learning they were testing a warp drive down the road. And the folks at the CCT were always nice and cooperative and more than happy to discuss their work with me

And third (this is completely geeky), my sci-fi theory for faster than light travel revolves around gravity waves.

My thinking goes (and I was told this was the case) that gravity waves behave like regular waves, meaning they can interfere with one another. I’ll just link to the wiki article on the phenomena to save time. So if gravity waves can interfere with another another like regular waves then you can do one of two interesting things: neutralize a wave or cause it to resonate. Just like how a singer can shatter a champagne glass by producing the right tone, we might be able to do something similar to space-time itself without needing a pair of black holes. That’s what’s great about resonance patterns and standing waves. They let you keep contributing tiny bits of energy to a wave to keep increasing its amplitude. It’s like pushing someone on a swing to get them higher and higher. So, let’s do the same with gravity and significantly smaller masses to see what happens.

I even emailed Michio Kaku once asking if this was possible, but never got a response. I’ll put it in a wildly popular book one day and then he won’t be able to ignore me any longer! Geek rant (fail) over.

So, I brought the story to the attention of the editor and dove right into setting up interviews and doing research. After many hours of work, I produced a 900 words feature story on the facility and sent it to the editor for review. She rejected it on the basis it was too technical.

I was really upset with this at the time and it even irks me a little now, given the recent breakthrough. I had been so excited about the story and put a lot of time and effort into it, as well as taking up other people’s time. And well, I didn’t get paid. It might have only been like $25 or $30. I can’t remember for certain, but it was my money. But looking back now with the benefit of experience and reading the original story (which I pulled off a laptop older than the story), the editor wasn’t completely wrong. The story was in need of some dumbing down.

Fortunately, I wasn’t finished with LIGO. It took another year and a new editor (managing editor), as well as developing my own abilities and reputation as a writer. We got one of those overly complicated press releases about the facility “reaching design sensitivity,” and the managing editor at the time (who kept things running through Katrina), Samantha Morgan, brought it to my attention. Well, I jumped at the chance to do another LIGO story and be paid for it this time. Samantha, who remains a good friend and has moved onto much bigger and better things, was a lot more open-minded about story ideas, thankfully. And I felt that was to the benefit of the paper. So, when I got in touch with old contacts, reused some stuff from the original story I wrote, and updated things with the news in the press release, she published the story. It took a year, but I got it done.

I wish I could link to the story. Once upon a time, I could have, but the original website that hosted all of my freelance stories from those days died when the paper re-branded itself, DIG. It’s kind of sad and I wish the publisher would post those old stories in an archive format or something, assuming copies of them still exist.

Nevertheless, I like to hold onto things that might become important later, so here’s a scan from one of my old copies of the original issue of Tiger Weekly, March 22-28, 2006. You can click on them to enlarge them for the sake of readability. And yes, there is at least one typo. I think I have a typo curse or something about my writing style screws with people’s brains. Even when my stuff goes through professional editors, its weird how artifacts escape notice. And I’m not faulting Samantha. Tiger Weekly had a shoestring (if your shoestrings are made of dental floss) budget and reliable copy editors were hard to come by. The one or two we did have time to time were usually just overwhelmed trying to edit a dozen stories on a Sunday afternoon.

LIGO Story 2006_0001 LIGO Story 2006_0002

And for comparison sake, here’s the original 2005 version of the story. It’s more general, more technical, was never published, and never passed before the eyes of a copy editor. But I’m still a little proud of it. It’s cool being able to say that, yes, I covered what LIGO was up to ten years before the big boys even deigned to notice it. I bet the relevant Wikipedia entries got slammed with traffic when word got out.

LIGO

2/22/2005

Brian Fontenot

902 Words

 

They call it LIGO. In the past, others, Albert Einstein included, merely called it impossible.

LIGO, which stands for Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory, is a roughly $400 million ongoing project. Its purpose is to detect gravity waves.

Scientists often compare gravity waves to electromagnetic waves like radio waves and light. But, this is the dumbed down explanation. Einstein envisioned the entire universe and its four dimensions, height, length, depth, and time as a kind of rubber sheet or a trampoline. If one puts a bowling ball on a trampoline, the mass of the bowling ball warps the canvas. If one then puts a tennis ball on the trampoline it will roll towards the bowling ball, because of the warping of the canvas. The warping of the canvas is similar to how mass warps space-time.

Gravity waves aren’t nearly so easy to explain. They are often confused with gravity, itself. One major difference being only accelerating masses generate gravity waves, while any mass generates a gravitational field.

Dr. Peter Diener, Assistant Professor of Physics at LSU, explained, “Essentially, you can look at gravity waves as little ripples of space-time emanating from a source.”

Diener works at the Center for Computation and Technology at LSU. He’s an expert in numerical relativity and large scale computing, which is a good thing, as he is tasked with generating computer models of things like binary black holes spiraling into each other and what the gravity waves generated by them would look like. LIGO researchers use his models as a kind of guidebook for analyzing collected data. This is not a simple task. Gravity is easily near the top of the list of least understood natural phenomena. But with LIGO and advanced computer modeling, Diener and his colleagues hope to find some answers.

“One of the questions we hope to answer is whether or not gravity waves travel at the speed of light.”

The interesting thing about these relatively weak gravity waves is the fact they warp space-time. Distances expand and contract, minutely, as these waves pass by. So, a meter stick would be as long as a meter, but wouldn’t be as long as a meter. Yes, it is confusing.

LIGO, which has two detectors in Hanford, Washington and one in Livingston, Louisiana, is designed to detect the gravity waves generated by binary neutron stars spiraling into each other. It does this by shooting a high power laser into a beam splitter, which cuts the beam into two. The two beams, which are sealed in a 1m in diameter pipe, travel out perpendicular to each other for 4km. At the end of the two 4km pipes are mirrors, which reflect the beams back down the pipes, back to the splitter.

This is where things get nuts. The apparatus is so precise the two laser beams are designed to cause deconstructive interference with each other, canceling each other out. This interference is like pushing someone on a swing as they are coming toward you and not while they are going away from you. The result would be the person pushing and the person swinging, clobbering each other. This interference is commonly seen in the rainbow colors made by oil and soap bubbles.

The researchers at LIGO use this interference to detect gravity waves. If a strong enough wave passes through the detector, it will actually warp the distance the lasers travel, throwing them just enough out of the deconstructive phases they are in to emit light.

This level of precision is absolutely necessary when you’re trying to measure a change in distance caused by a gravity wave, which is roughly 1/100,000,000 the diameter of a Hydrogen atom.

Dr. Gabriella Gonzalez, an Associate Professor at LSU, who is also the Experimentalist Co-Chair of the In-Spiraling Group at LIGO, mainly deals with setting up this insanely precise apparatus. She does things like making sure the mirrors are as close to perfectly aligned as possible. She is also an expert on the sensitivity of LIGO and what is able to detect.

“The only system for which we make a prediction about the detection rate is a binary neutron star system,” said Gonzalez. “For neutron stars we have a good idea of what the wave should look like.”

The researchers are working everyday to make the system more precise. They’ve spent the last few years just screening out noise sources like seismic disruptions. They’ve set out to hit a mark they call “Initial LIGO” which is a strain value of 10-23. The last scientific run of LIGO, the fourth scientific run, reached a strain value of 10-22 and the last run was made back in January 2004. Keep in mind, the first scientific run spawned papers by 370 authors from over 40 institutions. The data from the second and third runs is still being analyzed.

“I think we may even beat the design we proposed,” said Gonzalez. “There’s always room for surprises.”

LIGO2, which is an upgrade to the current LIGO systems, is expected to increase the sensitivity of the system by a factor of 10, which puts the range of the detector out to the Virgo cluster.

Currently, NASA and the ESA (European Space Agency) are in talks about constructing and launching an orbital version of LIGO, called LISA, which would be able to measure the gravity waves generated by the super massive black holes at the center of our galaxy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *